Back to recent texts

Immigration and Acculturation in Childhood

Linda R. Cote, PhD

Marymount University, USA

May 2020, Rev. ed.

Introduction

Immigration is the physical relocation of a person (and is typically thought of as relocation to another country).  People who have experienced international relocation are typically referred to as immigrants or international migrants.  Acculturation refers to the psychological adjustment of the individual who has experienced relocation. Both immigration and acculturation are personally transformative experiences.1,2 Thus, we would expect that the act of immigrating and the process of acculturating alter children’s development in significant ways. This article briefly describes the state of our knowledge of immigrant children’s psychological development.

Subject

Immigration and acculturation are not new phenomena, but the percentage of the world’s population that are immigrants (international migrants) has increased steadily over the past 40 years and is projected to continue increasing.3 Current estimates indicate that approximately 272 million people (1 in 30) currently live outside their country of birth or citizenship; 12 percent of whom are children.3,4 The United States has the largest number of immigrants in absolute terms but other countries such as Canada have a large proportion of immigrants (more than 1 in 5 residents are foreign-born), and immigration is not uniquely American.3,5 Individuals migrate for a variety of reasons, including employment or educational opportunities, family reunification, natural disasters, persecution, or political instability.2,3 Children overwhelmingly migrate with a parent (or to join parents) and thus have little choice about their migration. In the United States, currently more than one-quarter of American children are either immigrants or have at least one immigrant parent.6 Given the increasing numbers of immigrant children and children raised by immigrants worldwide, both in absolute numbers and proportionally, combined with the fact that most of the research on human development has focused on WEIRD populations (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic)7, immigration and acculturation are critical to a full understanding of child development. Despite their large and growing numbers, we know relatively little about how immigration and acculturation influence children’s development even though, because they are transformative experiences, we expect them to shape children’s development in fundamental ways. 

Problems

Major problems with the body of research on immigration and acculturation in childhood include:

  • The overwhelming majority of research on children’s development has been conducted with North American and European middle-class children, and as a result, we know little about how immigrant children’s development varies in different cultural contexts.  
  • It has focused on problem behaviours and not on how immigrant children experience normative developmental events. Thus, the research has not allowed for the discovery that immigrant children may be faring quite well in some areas.
  • As a consequence of the focus on problem behaviours, the bulk of research on immigrant children focuses on adolescents and not young children.
  • The research on immigrant children has often confounded immigrant status, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Failure to account for important sources of variability within “Latinos” or “Asian” Americans, for example, has led to tendencies to inaccurately group and unfairly stereotype immigrant children.   

Research Context

Most research on immigrant children’s development adopts a deficit model, focuses on adolescents and not infants or young children, confounds immigrant status with other sociodemographic variables, and suffers from small and/or demographically heterogenous samples. Moreover, much research historically has been an extension of cultural stereotypes (e.g., looking at teenage pregnancy among American Latinx youth, exploring academic performance among Asian American youth).

Key Research Questions

The key research questions with respect to immigration and acculturation in childhood that should be asked are:

  • Do immigrant children differ from their non-immigrant peers with respect to attainment of important developmental milestones? (For example, learning to speak or learning to read, when we know that in the United States, for example, most immigrant children are being raised in bilingual homes).8 
  • If so, what is the developmental significance of these differences? (For example, some research has suggested that the vocabulary development of immigrant toddlers lags behind that of their monolingual peers, but does that matter in the long run? In the short term, these children might be flagged for early intervention services with respect to language development, but in the long term they may benefit from the cognitive and social advantages that being able to speak, ead, orwrite in two languages confers.)
  • How can service providers (psychologists, social workers, schools, religious organizations, pediatricians and policy makers) assist with immigrant children’s successful adaptation to the country of destination, if such support is needed?

Recent Research Results

Most research on younger immigrant children’s development has centred on bilingual language acquisition9,10  and immigrant children’s academic performance.11,12 However, research in the past decade has explored topics as diverse as immigrant children’s health and physical development,13,14,15 gender development,16,17 mother-infant interaction,18,19,20 and immigrant parents’ emotional socialization,21,22 parenting practices (e.g., feeding,23,24 praise and encouragement,25 discipline,26 intrusiveness27), parenting styles,28 and mental health,29 for example. Three trends in recent research are noteworthy.  First, research in the past decade has begun to focus on immigrant groups more specifically (e.g., South Korean) rather than generally (e.g., “Asian”), along with the acknowledgement that our conclusions may apply specifically and not necessarily generally.  For example, research on mother-infant interactions in immigrant families show that both South Korean immigrant and Japanese immigrant mothers responded to their infants’ person-directed interactions more than they initiated them.18,20 However, South Korean immigrant mothers initiated object-directed interactions with their infants more than they responded to their infants and there were no differences in initiation and responsiveness for Japanese immigrant dyads’ object-directed interactions.18,20 Second, research has begun to focus on the developmental sequelae of family experiences for young children in immigrant families. For example, research shows that immigrant mothers’ acculturation levels in infancy influence the percentage of time bilingual mothers speak the heritage language or English to their children, which in turn influences toddlers’ vocabulary development in each of the languages (and this appears to be true generally).9 As another example, in Japanese immigrant families, mothers’ responsiveness to their infants’ object-directed behavior was positively related to the children’s symbolic play in toddlerhood, which in turn was positively related to their language skills in early childhood.19 

Finally, contemporary research has attempted to understand and explain results from the perspective of indigenous cultures of origin, rather than from a culture of destination (European or North American) perspective.  For example, although developmental psychologists in the United States and Europe emphasize the importance of maternal responsiveness to infants’ behavioral initiations for the development of a child’s sense of agency and autonomy, in South Korean immigrant families, the greater responsiveness of infants to their mothers’ initiation in object-directed interactions can be interpreted as infants becoming socialized into the South Korean virtues of jull-ze (moderating one’s desires to maintain harmony) and zeung-zee (respecting one’s parents teachings and will).18 

Research Gaps

First, we need to know more about how immigrant children achieve normative developmental milestones, whether their developmental trajectories differ from those of majority children, and what the developmental significance of any differences may be. Second, research on immigrant children has tended to focus on adolescents, and we know less about the development of infants and young children from immigrant families (when intervention, if necessary, might prove most productive). Finally, although this is beginning to change, we know less about within-group variability than desirable. For example, many times Latino youth are lumped together in American research studies, even though immigrants to the United States from different Latin American communities differ from each other in a variety of ways.

Conclusions

The large and growing numbers of immigrants around the world, and our dearth of knowledge about them, necessitate that we learn more about immigrant children’s normative development, their needs and their strengths. These factors also require that we pay particular attention to areas of well-being that may not be as great an issue with non-migrant children and families. For example, the stress of migration may make immigrant mothers more susceptible to depression than non-migrant mothers, and depression affects parenting and children’s development adversely. Immigrants may have a particularly difficult time adjusting to their new culture if the migration is not voluntary (as in the case of refugees) or if immigrants are socially isolated (from either family, friends, or cultural community). What is known about immigrant families suggests that childrearing beliefs tend to be more consistent over time and slower to acculturate than either children’s behaviours or parenting practices, although there is some cultural variability in this.2,20,21 Most research results present a picture of strengths as well as areas  where immigrant children could be better supported. 

Implications for Parents, Services, and Policy

Perhaps the most important implication of immigration and acculturation for parents, service providers, and policy makers is to recognize that immigrant parents have implicit cultural beliefs and childrearing goals and practices, just as service providers and policy makers do, and these deeply held, unspoken ideas about what is “best” for children may differ.  Thus, just as immigrants are learning about and adapting to their new country, it behooves practitioners and policy makers to learn more about the cultural beliefs and practices of their service population so that they can better support immigrant families.  For example, immigrant parents may hold ideas about the genesis and treatment of disease that are very different from physicians’ ideas.30 Clinicians may hold inaccurate beliefs about bilingualism or preference monolingualism even though this does not reflect the current state of knowledge of bilingualism in early childhood.31 The American Academy of Pediatrics’ recent policy statement on caring for immigrant children,30 which addresses the need for practitioners’ cultural understanding, is a step in the right direction.

In conclusion, increasing parents’ knowledge of cultural beliefs and expectations about child development in the country of destination, and increasing service providers’ and policy makers’ knowledge of immigrant parents’ cultural beliefs about child rearing and normative child development, are key to creating partnerships that will foster the growth and well-being of all of children.

References

  1. Redfield R, Linton R, Herskovits M. Memorandum on the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist 1936;38(1):149-152.
  2. Bornstein MH, Cote LR.  Immigrant parenthood. In: Bornstein MH, ed. Handbook of parenting. Volume 4: Social conditions and applied parenting. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2019:198-233.  
  3. United Nations. World Migration Report 2020. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2019. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/wmr_2020.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2020.  
  4. UNICEF. Child Migration. UNICEF. April 2020. https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-migration-and-displacement/migration/. Accessed: April 22, 2020.  
  5. Griffith A. Building a mosaic: The evolution of Canada’s approach to immigrant integration. Migration Information Source. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/building-mosaic-evolution-canadas-approach-immigrant-integration. Published November 1, 2017. Accessed April 22, 2020.
  6. Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. Table: AM4 Children of at least one foreign-born parent: Percentage of children ages 0–17 by nativity of child and parents, parent's education, poverty status, and other characteristics. 2018. https://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren/family4.asp. Accessed April 23, 2020.
  7. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2010;33:61-135.
  8. U.S. Census. American Community Survey, Selected Characteristics of the Native and Foreign-Born Populations, 2018:  ACD 1-year estimates subject table. 2018. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=S05&d=ACS%201-Year%20Estimates%20Subject%20Tables&tid=ACSST1Y2018.S0501. Accessed April 30, 2020.
  9. Cote LR, Bornstein MH. Productive vocabulary among three groups of bilingual American children: Comparison and prediction. First Language. 2014;34(6):467-485. doi:10.1177/0142723714560178 
  10. Hoff E. Bilingual development in children of immigrant families. Child Development Perspectives 2018;12(2):80-86. doi:10.1111/cdep.12262
  11. Browne DT, Wade M, Prime H, Jenkins JM. School readiness amongst urban Canadian families: Risk profiles and family mediation. Journal of Educational Psychology 2018;110(1):133-146. doi:10.1037/edu0000202
  12. Lehti V, Gyllenberg D, Suominen A, Sourander A. Finnish‐born children of immigrants are more likely to be diagnosed with developmental disorders related to speech and language, academic skills and coordination. Acta Paediatrica 2018;107(8):1409-1417. doi:10.1111/apa.14308
  13. Dawson-Hahn E, Koceja L, Stein E, Farmer B, Grow HM, Saelens BE, Mendoza J, Pak-Gorstein S. Perspectives of caregivers on the effects of migration on the nutrition, health and physical activity of their young children: A qualitative study with immigrant and refugee families. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 2020;22(2):274-281. doi:10.1007/s10903-019-00905-6
  14. Berge JM, Fertig A, Tate A, Trofholz A, Neumark-Sztainer D. Who is meeting the Healthy People 2020 objectives?: Comparisons between racially/ethnically diverse and immigrant children and adults. Families, Systems, and Health 2018;36(4):451-470. doi:10.1037/fsh0000376
  15. Carra C, Lavelli M, Keller H. Differences in practices of body stimulation during the first 3 months: Ethnotheories and behaviors of Italian mothers and West African immigrant mothers. Infant Behavior & Development 2014;37(1):5-15. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.10.004
  16. Schroeder KM, Bámaca‐Colbert MY. Cultural underpinnings of gender development: Studying gender among children of immigrants. Child Development 2019;90(4):1005-1015. doi:10.1111/cdev.13265
  17. Zosuls KM, Ruble DN, Tamis‐LeMonda CS. Self‐socialization of gender in African American, Dominican immigrant, and Mexican immigrant toddlers. Child Development 2014;85(6):2202-2217.
  18. Bornstein MH, Cote LR, Kwak K.  Comparative and individual perspectives on mother-infant interactions with people and objects among South Koreans, Korean Americans, and European Americans. Infancy 2019;24(4):526-546. doi:10.1111/infa.12288
  19. Cote LR, Bornstein MH. Specialization, coordination, and developmental sequelae of mother-infant person- and object-directed interactions in U.S. American immigrant families. In: Chuang SS, Costigan CL, eds. Parental roles and relationships in immigrant families: An international approach. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media; 2018:91-109. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71399-1_6
  20. Bornstein MH, Cote LR, Haynes OM, Bakeman R, Suwalsky JTD. Modalities of mother-infant interaction in Japanese, Japanese American immigrant, and European American dyads. Child Development 2012;83(6):2073-2088. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01822.x   
  21. Curtis K, Zhou Q, Tao A. Emotion talk in Chinese American immigrant families and longitudinal links to children’s socioemotional competence. Developmental Psychology 2020;56(3):475-488. doi:10.1037/dev0000806
  22. Cheah CSL, Li J, Zhou N, Yamamoto Y, Leung CYY. Understanding Chinese immigrant and European American mothers’ expressions of warmth. Developmental Psychology 2015;51(12):1802-1811. doi:10.1037/a0039855
  23. Vu KTT, Cheah CSL, Sun S, Zhou N, Xue X. Adaptation and assessment of the Child Feeding Questionnaire for Chinese immigrant families of young children in the United States. Child: Care, Health and Development 2020;46(1):74-82. doi:10.1111/cch.12715
  24. Lok KYW, Bai DL, Chan NPT, Wong JYH, Tarrant M. The impact of immigration on the breastfeeding practices of mainland Chinese immigrants in Hong Kong. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care 2018;45(1):94:102. doi:10.1111/birt.12314
  25. Seo YJ, Cheah CSL, Hart CH. Korean immigrant mothers’ praise and encouragement, acculturation, and their children’s socioemotional and behavioral difficulties. Parenting: Science and Practice 2017;17(2):143-155. doi:10.1080/15295192.2017.1304786
  26. Bradley RH, Pennar A, Glick J. Home environments of infants from immigrant families in the united states: Findings from the new immigrant survey. Infant Mental Health Journal 2014;35(6):565-579. doi:10.1002/imhj.21477
  27. Kho C, Main A, Chung S, Zhou Q. Intrusive parenting in Chinese American immigrant families: Relations with cultural orientations and children’s adjustment. Asian American Journal of Psychology 2019;10(4):341-350. doi:10.1037/aap0000165
  28. Vu KTT, Castro KM, Cheah CSL, Yu J. Mediating and moderating processes in the associations between Chinese immigrant mothers’ acculturation and parenting styles in the United States. Asian American Journal of Psychology 2019;10(4):307-315. doi:10.1037/aap0000150
  29. Skoog M, Hallström I, Berggren V. ‘There’s something in their eyes’—Child Health Services nurses’ experiences of identifying signs of postpartum depression in non-Swedish-speaking immigrant mothers. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2017;31(4):739-747. doi:10.1111/scs.12392
  30. Linton JM, Green A, AAP COUNCIL ON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS. Providing Care for Children in Immigrant Families. Pediatrics 2019;144(3):e20192077.
  31. Hoff E, Core C. What clinicians need to know about bilingual development. Seminars in Speech and Language 2015;36(2):89-99. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1549104

How to cite this article:

Cote LR. Immigration and Acculturation in Childhood. In: Tremblay RE, Boivin M, Peters RDeV, eds. Bornstein MH, topic ed. Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development [online]. http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/immigration/according-experts/immigration-and-acculturation-childhood. Updated May 2020. Accessed July 11, 2020.